Stati Parties v Republic of Kazakhstan: Significant wins for the Statis and their creditors in Sweden and the USA
On 14 June 2023, the Swedish Supreme Court refused Kazakhstan permission to appeal a 16 January 2023 decision of the Swedish Court of Appeal, confirming conclusively that the Statis are entitled to enforce against Sovereign Wealth Fund assets seized in the jurisdiction and valued at approximately US$76 million. The Court of Appeal’s decision is discussed further in our earlier post.
Similarly, on 13 June 2023, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York unanimously affirmed a decision of 29 August 2022 dismissing Kazakhstan’s case against Argentem Creek Partners and (unusually for US proceedings) ordering Kazakhstan to pay its opponents’ costs. The earlier decision roundly dismissed Kazakhstan’s allegations that the Stati-creditor had conspired to enforce a tainted award, noting that the Swedish courts had already rejected arguments that the award was obtained by fraud.
Robert Bedford, Legal Director, commented:
Courts in the US and Sweden have affirmed important decisions dismissing Kazakhstan’s efforts to avoid obligations under international treaty and a confirmed SCC award. These are significant steps in the Statis’ ongoing enforcement action.
Astraea Group acts as Global Counsel for the Stati Parties in their ongoing, multi-jurisdictional action to enforce a US$500 million SCC arbitral award against the Republic of Kazakhstan. The team is led by Partner James Ramsden KC and Legal Director Robert Bedford.
Click below for the relevant judgments:
The information provided in this article is of a general nature and does not constitute, nor should be relied on, as legal or professional advice.
Share Article:
News & Insights
From Stablecoins to ‘Digital Bills of Exchange’: Why Monitoring After Sanctions Implementation Is Critically Important
Co-authored by James Ramsden KC, Dr Khrystyna Khanas and Dr Tetiana Dmytrenko.
Read article
Carry on Litigating? Mazur and the Limits of Supervision
Few judgments have caused so much gnashing of metaphorical teeth and rending of figurative garments in the legal professions in recent years as that of Mr Justice Sheldon in Mazur & Anor v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB).
Read article
Non-Financial Misconduct: The Culture Reckoning Deepens
The Financial Conduct Authority’s recently published results of its survey of how firms detect and handle non-financial misconduct paints a revealing picture of a market still struggling to align conduct and culture.
Read article
Chambers & Partners 2026: Astraea “reaches beyond legal technical excellence”
Chambers & Partners 2026
Read article