Directors, Dissent and Duty: Lessons from Saxon
Sooner or later, every business reaches a point where its decision-makers disagree. The challenge is rarely the disagreement itself, but how that disagreement is managed once a decision has to be made. The Supreme Court’s decision in Saxon offers a timely case study in that challenge: what happens when one decision-maker believes they know what is best for the business, but the business has chosen a different path?
This article is co-authored by Astraea’s Rob Bedford and Lisa McCreath
Share Article:
News & Insights
Freezing Orders and Foreign Respondents: The Court of Appeal Draws a Firm Jurisdictional Line in Gilbert v Broadoak Private Finance Ltd
Co-authored by Joe Young, Partner and Dr Khrystyna Khanas, Senior Associate.
Read article
Corporate privilege after Jardine, Serendipity and Aabar: a clearer but more disciplined landscape
Co-authored by Joe Young, Partner and Dr Khrystyna Khanas, Senior Associate.
Read article
From Stablecoins to ‘Digital Bills of Exchange’: Why Monitoring After Sanctions Implementation Is Critically Important
Co-authored by James Ramsden KC, Dr Khrystyna Khanas and Dr Tetiana Dmytrenko.
Read article
Carry on Litigating? Mazur and the Limits of Supervision
Few judgments have caused so much gnashing of metaphorical teeth and rending of figurative garments in the legal professions in recent years as that of Mr Justice Sheldon in Mazur & Anor v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB).
Read article