Rory Mulchrone secures full admissions and striking-off order in major dishonesty case for SRA
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal has published its judgment in the case of Stephen David Jones, recently described by The Times as “Britain’s most corrupt solicitor”.
The judgment explains the Tribunal’s reasons for approving an Agreed Outcome between the Solicitors Regulation Authority and Mr Jones, whereby he belatedly admitted the entirety of the regulator’s case against him – including dishonesty – and was struck off the Roll of Solicitors.
That disciplinary sanction followed a successful application in the High Court, brought by a private claimant, to commit Mr Jones to prison for contempt of court. Mr Jones had previously breached a number of undertakings and orders requiring him to pay substantial monies into court and to provide disclosure. Mr Justice Zacaroli found the alleged contempt to be proved to the criminal standard and sentenced Mr Jones to a total of 14 months imprisonment (see Discovery Land Company LLC et al v Jirehouse et al [2019] EWHC 2249 (Ch); [2019] EWHC 2264 (Ch)).
The Tribunal’s order also came within days of Mr Jones being sentenced to an additional 12 years in prison by HHJ Griffith, sitting at Southwark Crown Court. Mr Jones had entered guilty pleas to two counts of fraud by abuse of position – offences committed during the course of the same retainer. The learned judge described this as a case of “rank dishonesty”.
Astraea Group’s Rory Mulchrone prosecuted the disciplinary case for the SRA, instructed by Hannah Pilkington of Capsticks Solicitors LLP. He commented:
This must be one of the most egregious dishonesty cases ever brought before the SDT. I am delighted that the Tribunal has approved this Agreed Outcome and imposed the ultimate sanction.
The full judgment is available here.
The information provided in this article is of a general nature and does not constitute, nor should be relied on, as legal or professional advice.
Share Article:
News & Insights
Carry on Litigating? Mazur and the Limits of Supervision
Few judgments have caused so much gnashing of metaphorical teeth and rending of figurative garments in the legal professions in recent years as that of Mr Justice Sheldon in Mazur & Anor v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB).
Read article
Non-Financial Misconduct: The Culture Reckoning Deepens
The Financial Conduct Authority’s recently published results of its survey of how firms detect and handle non-financial misconduct paints a revealing picture of a market still struggling to align conduct and culture.
Read article
Chambers & Partners 2026: Astraea “reaches beyond legal technical excellence”
Chambers & Partners 2026
Read article
Legal 500 2026: Astraea is “ahead of the game”
Legal 500 2026
Read article